Recruitment should be the beginning of a long‑term, mutually beneficial relationship. Too often, today’s hiring processes feel opaque, transactional, and, let’s be honest, downright discouraging for the very people we’re trying to attract. After a decade of building and scaling tech teams, I still hear the same refrain from candidates:
“I never understood why I was rejected.”
It doesn’t have to be this way.
Below, I unpack what’s broken, lay out the feedback pledge my teams live by, and offer actionable steps any organisation can take to transform hiring into an engine of growth, for the business and every single applicant.
What’s Broken (and Why It Hurts Everyone)
Recruitment fails candidates and companies in four compounding ways:
| Pain Point | Why It Persists | Hidden Cost | One Small Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radio‑Silence Rejections | Applicant‑tracking systems make it effortless to click reject but not to explain. Hiring managers fear a clumsy email could trigger legal issues. | 75 % of candidates say silence feels worse than “no.” A third vent publicly, denting brand perception and draining future pipelines. | Draft a three‑line template: legal basics (“skills/experience mis‑alignment”) plus one personalised sentence. |
| One‑Way Evaluation | Interviews feel like interrogations: question after question, no dialogue. Power dynamics tilt toward the company. | 30 % of new hires quit within 90 days, citing “the role wasn’t what I expected.” Backfilling can cost 50 %+ of annual salary. | Reserve the last 10 minutes of every interview for candidate‑only questions. |
| Exclusion Over Inclusion | Keyword screens reward pedigree, not potential. “Culture fit” often masks affinity bias. Ads listing 20 “must‑haves” deter under‑represented talent. | Diverse teams outperform by 36 % (McKinsey 2023). Every bias‑filtered vacancy is lost innovation. | Run each job description through a bias checker (Textio, Gender Decoder) and trim requirements to the vital five. |
| Seat‑Filling KPIs | Metrics focus on time‑to‑hire, not time‑to‑value. Hiring sits in one budget, retention in another—so incentives clash. | Mid‑level turnover averages 150 % of salary (SHRM 2024). Recruiters burn out churning requisitions instead of nurturing talent communities. | Add a 6‑month quality‑of‑hire score (manager satisfaction) to every recruiter’s dashboard. |
A Call to Arms: The Feedback Pledge
Hiring without feedback is half‑finished work. Here’s the pledge my teams—and I—make to every single applicant. Steal it, adapt it, and above all honour it.
| Stage | What You Receive | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| CV / Résumé Review | One short paragraph explaining why we didn’t progress or what was missing. | Silence erodes trust; a sentence restores it. |
| Pre‑Interview | Up to 30 minutes of live Q&A. Ask anything—from tech stack, to culture quirks, to goals. | You walk in prepared and confident. We see the sharpest, most relevant version of you instead of a bundle of nerves. |
| After First Interview | If we pass, clarity on next steps. If we decline, ½ page of specific, constructive feedback you can act on immediately. | Even “no” can fuel growth when it’s explained. |
| After Final Interview | When we choose someone else, you get a full A4 page: strengths, gaps, and practical next moves. | Hard news delivered with care turns a rejection into a relationship. |
“Feedback isn’t a courtesy—it’s the minimum viable professionalism.”
Why the Pre‑Interview Call Is Shamelessly Self‑Interested
- I want the best version of the candidate. When they understand our challenges and language, nerves give way to relevant insight.
- I want them to invest where it counts. A prepared candidate spends their energy mapping experience to our reality, not second‑guessing basics they could have asked upfront.
- I want genuine mutual fit. If, after hearing the unvarnished truth about our culture and roadmap, they still lean in, we avoid wasted cycles later on.
When candidates feel ready, we see their true potential. That’s worth every minute of pre‑interview Q&A.
Mutual Discovery: Two‑Way Due Diligence
Getting the right hire isn’t just about us probing skills; it’s about both sides testing for a genuine, long‑term fit. A great recruitment process grants:
- Candidates a clear window into our real culture—how decisions get made, how teams collaborate, and what growth looks like day to day.
- Hiring teams a mirror that reflects the candidate’s authentic motivations, problem‑solving style, and learning mindset.
When both parties walk away knowing who they might work with—not just what they might work on—offers get accepted faster, ramp‑up time shrinks, and retention climbs.
What Happens When You Honour the Pledge
- Referral flywheel — Rejected candidates recommend friends because they felt respected.
- Sharper signal — Writing feedback forces us to articulate what we truly value—so decisions get faster and better.
- Brand equity — Transparency turns applicants into advocates, whether they join now or later.
“But Feedback Doesn’t Scale!”—Yes, It Does
Time invested up front saves brand repair, pipeline rebuilds, and re‑interviewing the same market next quarter. Four tactics:
- Template the Bones, Personalise the Heart — Keep standard language for legal safety; layer on two candidate‑specific sentences.
- Block “Feedback Fridays” — A recurring calendar slot beats good intentions every time.
- Record Quick Looms or Voice Notes — Three minutes of talking can replace twenty of typing; auto‑generated transcripts keep it accessible.
- Use Collaborative ATS Fields — Structured interviewer notes let a hiring manager stitch a cohesive summary in minutes.
Beyond Feedback: Building a Human‑Centred Hiring Ecosystem
Feedback is just one plank in a broader philosophy:
- Inclusive Role Profiles — Describe problems to solve instead of laundry‑lists of magic‑skills.
- Interviews as Learning Labs — Encourage candidates to bring ideas and challenge assumptions. Curiosity should flow both directions.
- Community‑First Pipelines — Stay in touch with silver‑medalists; invite them to webinars, newsletters, or future roles. Talent isn’t a one‑and‑done commodity.
Paying It Forward—Why Feedback Is the Least We Owe
If we ask candidates to research our business, tailor their CVs, and spend hours preparing for exercises, the least we can do is ensure they leave the process better off—even if they don’t move forward. A short, actionable insight or resource recommendation only takes minutes but compounds value:
- Candidates leave stronger. They apply your pointers in their next interview—maybe even with you.
- We attract sharper talent back. Well‑briefed applicants raise the bar for everyone in the next hiring cycle.
- It’s cultural signalling. A growth‑mindset company puts learning above ego; the market notices.
Pay it forward, and the dividends return through better‑prepared, better‑aligned candidates the next time you open a role.
Cheat Code: AI‑Powered Feedback Generator
When calendars are full and task-lists keep filling up, AI can shoulder the first draft of thoughtful feedback—without losing the human touch. Drop the role spec, your live interview notes, and the target depth of feedback into the prompt below, then polish the output in your own voice.
You are my Recruitment Feedback Assistant.
INPUTS
1. ROLE_SPEC: <paste full job description or core responsibilities>
2. CANDIDATE_NOTES: <paste bullet notes captured during interview>
3. FEEDBACK_LEVEL: <choose one → "snapshot" (1–2 paragraphs), "focused" (½ page), "deep‑dive" (full A4)>
TASK
Act as a considerate yet direct hiring manager.
• Draft feedback that balances strengths, growth areas, and at least one actionable next step.
• Use inclusive, bias‑aware language.
• Reference specifics from CANDIDATE_NOTES.
• Keep to the requested FEEDBACK_LEVEL length.
• Close with an encouraging tone (e.g., invite to reapply after X months or share learning resources).
OUTPUT FORMAT
====================
FEEDBACK_TITLE: <one clear line, e.g. "Next Steps for Backend Engineer Role">
STRENGTHS:
- Bullet 1
- Bullet 2
AREAS_TO_GROW:
- Bullet 1
- Bullet 2
NEXT_STEPS:
- One practical recommendation (course, project, mentoring angle)
====================
Why it works:
Role spec anchors expectations, interview notes inject evidence, and FEEDBACK_LEVEL scales effort. A quick human edit ensures nuance and warmth—AI does the heavy lifting, you bring the empathy.
Call to Action
Hiring leaders: pick one commitment you can implement this week.
- Draft a rejection‑email template that adds two personalised insights.
- Offer 15‑minute pre‑interview calls for your next open role.
- Block an hour to audit inclusive language in your job descriptions.
Candidates: ask for feedback—politely but persistently. Great employers will welcome the chance to improve.
Conclusion
Recruitment is the front door to your culture. Make it transparent, inclusive, and growth‑oriented, and you’ll attract the very people who will build and protect that culture from the inside out.
Let’s move beyond transactions and treat every hiring conversation as a chance to strengthen our professional ecosystem—whether the answer today is yes, no, or not yet.
Leave a Reply